• Glossary
  • Key Thinkers
  • All Exercices
  • All Podcasts
  • Linguistic FAQs
  • All Links
  • Complete Reading List
  • Log In

General Linguistics

  • Theory, Model, Method
  • Phonetics and Phonology
  • Morphology
  • Syntax
  • Semantics
  • Pragmatics

Selected Subfields

  • History of English
  • Syntactic Theory
  • Cognitive Approaches
    • Focus and Content
    • Exercises
      • Universal Grammar
      • Nativism
      • Georgian versus English
      • Restrictions and implications
      • Constraints on human conceptualization
      • Gestalt principles
      • Perception
      • Perception of the world
      • Research Piraha
      • Research exercise: What's the meaning of meh?
      • Develop a semantic frame
      • Find the right frame
      • Help me finding the right frame
      • COMMERCIAL EVENT frame
      • Rate the items in each category
      • List criteria for rating items
      • Metaphor characteristics
      • Metaphors
      • Identify metaphors I
      • Identify metaphors II
      • Metaphors & colour categories
      • Source concepts
      • Metonymy characteristics
      • Relationships concerning metonymy
      • Metaphor or Metonymy?
    • Tools and Extras
  • Language and Media
  • Sociolinguistics
  • Theories and Methods in Linguistics

CognitiveApproaches » Exercises » Relationships concerning metonymy

Cognitive Approaches


Metaphor & Metonymy

Relationships concerning metonymy

There are different relationships concerning metonymy. Try to find out which relationship is presented in the respective examples below:

1) (:vips 9776:)

2) (:vips 9777:)

3) (:vips 9778:)

4) (:vips 9779:)

5) (:vips 9780:)

6) (:vips 9781:)

7) (:vips 9782:)

8) (:vips 9783:)

9) (:vips 9784:)

< Metonymy characteristics | Selected Subfields | Metaphor or Metonymy? >


© abergs | ELLO (English Language and Linguistics Online) | Logout |